Stevenson’s case rests on movement. He has won titles at featherweight, junior lightweight, and lightweight. He believes that range should carry more weight than fighters who built their standing in one division or only moved once.
“A lot of people stayed at that one weight class,” Stevenson said. “They got their accomplishments there. Or they went up to one other weight. But I went up to one, two, three.”
That argument leaves out the point critics return to. Stevenson won belts, but the opposition, including Joet Gonzalez, a 35-year-old Jermell Herring, and Edwin De Los Santos, was not the strongest available at the time. Those wins count, but none forced a division to react or reset around him. That has shaped how his run is judged.
Stevenson maintains he did what the structure allowed.
“It ain’t never been my fault that the titles were vacated,” he said. “I ended up fighting the number one and number two. People complain about fighters being emailed the belt, then complain about a fighter like me who fought the number one and number two guy.”
The criticism is about choice, since Stevenson had leverage and did not press for tougher opponents. At featherweight, Rafael Espinoza was available. At 130, O’Shaquie Foster was there. At 135, Abdullah Mason presented real risk. Those fights would have carried more weight than belt collection alone.
Instead, Stevenson defended titles without testing the deepest end of each division. That kept his position secure, but limited how far it carried.
As he moves to 140, the same question follows him. Gary Antuanne Russell and Richardson Hitchins remain active against opponents who carry real risk. At that weight, the standard is higher, and those are the fights that tend to shift how a fighter is viewed.
Pound for pound lists are subjective, but they tend to reward fighters who make difficult decisions. Until those show up consistently, the seventh reflects how Stevenson’s career has been managed, not how skilled he is.
Read the full article here
